thuviaptarth: golden thuvia with six-legged lion (Default)
thuvia ptarth ([personal profile] thuviaptarth) wrote2006-08-20 05:23 pm
Entry tags:

Premieres/Vid Review: 2

Moderated by [livejournal.com profile] cesperanza and [livejournal.com profile] sockkpuppett
Playlist


Belinda, "Black Mask" (Batman Returns)
Lum called it a great song choice but said that Belinda had lost her part-way through because of the inappropriate use of literalism; the clip of the cowl was just too much. She really liked the bats flying out on the drumroll. [livejournal.com profile] astolat said that the cowl should have been the last clip; the vid should have ended with that because it's in the voice of Bruce Wayne before he becomes Batman. Lum or Cesca pointed out that this was Belinda's first vid, which got a round of applause because it's an impressive first effort.

Keerawa, "Big Gun" (Farscape)
This was another overly literal effort; [livejournal.com profile] heresluck said that it reduced Aeryn to a one-note character. Lum suggested starting the song on the metaphorical meanings of "big gun" and working around to the literal, but "theshoshanna"> thought it would work better the other way around. [livejournal.com profile] cereta was jerked out of the song by the inappropriate use of Aeryn's real mom and dad, who are the opposite of how they're described in the song.

shalott, "Bukowski" (House)
[livejournal.com profile] sockkpuppett thought the cutting was a little too fast; [livejournal.com profile] laurashapiro also thought there should be more variation in the cutting. [livejournal.com profile] vagabondage thought the vid was made by the reaction shots on the first "asshole." This seemed to be a really big crowd-pleaser, and even I could see its charm, as much as I have hardened my heart against Hugh Laurie and his show's dangers for hypochondriacs.

Melina, "Media Vita" (Rome)
Lum mentioned how the visuals and the lyrics parallelled each other--even if you don't know Latin, you know "mortis," dead. She wondered if the anachronism of using Church music bothered anyway. I said that it worked for me, because the Christian resurrection and the story of the vid are both stories of blood sacrifice--Lucius and Caesar are both annointed by priests with bulls' blood, and then themselves are sacrificed (Caesar's bloody robe; Lucius's bloody hands; Titus Pullo in the arena) to the city of Rome, by the city of Rome; blood sacrifices in the story of history. [livejournal.com profile] cereta remarked on the cleverness of anchoring the vid around the Caesar story, whose loose outlines are familiar even to people who didn't watch Rome. [livejournal.com profile] killabeez praised the use of symbolic objects like the eagle standards and the birds flying across the sky.

Jill, "Crazy" and Absolute Destiny, "There Is Too Much Light in This Bar" (both Life on Mars)
From Vividcon, I have deduced that Life on Mars is a cop show with multiple lighting schemes, about a cop who is extremely confused about something or other and has an intense relationship with his television. Nevertheless, I suspect the cop is not a fan responding to the plot developments in his favorite show.

People had a lot to say about these vids, almost none of which I noted down. Someone approved of the Gnarls Barkley, which took her to a Marvin Gaye/Al Green soul place, even though it's a contemporary song; the vid was like watching a Pros vid, updated. [livejournal.com profile] melina123 loved the vid even though she dislikes the show. She may have said, "I've never felt like I was crazy in such a stylin' way," although it sounds more like [livejournal.com profile] cesperanza to me. (The problems of notes with insufficient attributions, alas.)

The Life on Mars vids actually reminded me of something a lot of people said about last year's vid show, which is that it was technically excellent but not fannish, or not emotional in a particular way. I'm not ready to conclude that the difference is in the vids, rather than the Not My Fandom problem, but I thought both of these were excellent and enjoyable and "There Is Too Much Light" was hysterically funny, but I don't remember much about them or feel particularly likely to watch the show. [livejournal.com profile] minnow1212 mentioned something about wondering now, how much of her emotional reactions were tied to palette choice, and I wonder about that for myself, too.

Destina, "Hurt" (Brokeback Mountain)
A lot of us seemed to have started out really worried about whether the vid could do justice to the song (and to the Johnny Cash video, which is tremendously moving) and to have come out of it relieved that yes, it was working, [livejournal.com profile] destina was working it with the depth and empathy it deserved. Shoshanna was reassured that Destina began with the end of the movie, that she wasn't just going to retell the story of the movie (Melina called that the "trap" of movie vids), and particularly noted the parallel clips of Ennis hitting Jack and Jack being beaten to death; the narrative is the narrative of Ennis' guilt. Cesca praised the vid for being "very sparing."

Bunniquila, "Bound" (Coming Up from Behind)
The vid is sepia-filtered, and the version of the song is much slower than the one Killa used; it's a very sexy song that fits the vid's femme fatale aggressiveness.

Andraste, "Ophelia" (Babylon 5)
Fans of the show adored the mix of major and minor female characters. Laura called it the "Anti-Dead-Girlfriend-of-the-Week vid." Cesca liked it even though "I'm actually allergic to Natalie Merchant, I have to take pills for that." The vid breaks the "rules" of "one POV," or it goes for an omniscient POV that makes the audience the omniscient narrator: we're the people who mourn all the women.

Keely, "I Remember When" (Angel/BtVS)
Someone: "Not just another Spike/Angel vid." Laura liked the way the changes in tone matched the changes in musical structure. Zen called it "kickass." It took me until vid review to realize that a possible reading of "I'm better than him" is "I'm better than my previous self"; I'd seen it as more externalized, Spike projecting his self-loathing onto other characters, Angel, Giles, etc.; the vid is the stronger for working both ways.

F1renze, "Ragged Ass Road" (Prison Break)
Lum: "I think y'all are watching the wrong brothers show." Melina praised the "perfect, perfect, perfect song choice" and the use of objects and symbols: the origami swan, the tattoos, the stained glass windows. Shalott loved the crisp, beautiful, vibrant palette and the imagery of the torn scraps of sheet. Laura called it the "perfect con vid"--it sells the show to people who don't watch it and offers even more meaning to those who do. [livejournal.com profile] elynross praised it for illustrating the complexity of the show without requiring contextual knowledge.

*cough* As someone who fell for the other brothers show post-VVC--my god, I wish Supernatural looked half that good.

Abby, "Walk the Line" (March of the Penguins)
The general consensus, with which I agree, was that this was adorable but also too long. It would have been more effective if it were shorter. Abby responded that she had made it as a cheer-herself-up vid after a lousy year; she wouldn't want it to be any shorter because she just wanted to enjoy the adorable-ness.

Eunice, "Lullaby" (Dead Poets Society)
[livejournal.com profile] sisabet: I could hardly hear the music because I was deafened by the tears in the back row.
Cesca: There is no crying in vid review!

Someone (I think Cesca? or Killa?) remarked on how the vid gave inanimate objects power, citing the return to the leaves, the book of poetry; Killa contrasted it to the use of objects in Destina's Brokeback Mountain vid.

It made me feel weepy even though I have not seen the movie and found the many teen white boys with brownish hair indistinguishable. ([livejournal.com profile] heresluck, as offended as if they were her very own students: "They are not indistinguishable!" Me: "I cannot tell any of them apart. That's what 'indistinguishable' means." here's luck: [gives me the evil eye])

Dualbunny & Gerry, "One Day Late" (Firefly/Serenity)
People mostly enjoyed this one, although there was some dispute about the last clip of Mal naked on the rock, which a lot of people felt was inappropriately light after the vid's slowly darkening tone. I liked it because it reminded me of the Grr Argh monster saying, "I need a hug" at the end of the credits for "Becoming II"; Joss always does that unpredictable shift of tone.

I had a hard time on the first viewing because I kept thinking, "But--that rescue's not one day late! It's exactly on time! They are rescued!" What? Sometimes I am strange and overly literal. The problem went away in later viewings because you can see the increasing out-of-whackness and untimeliness of the rescues as the vid goes on: first they're on time, then they're a little late, then they're a little later, then they're ... too late.
ext_7843: (Default)

[identity profile] untrue-accounts.livejournal.com 2006-08-21 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
But as regards vids, please don't box them into some notion of what you think media fandom looks like, especially if it's one as tiny as this one sounds.

You keep reacting as if I'm saying that vids are doing something wrong when they don't meet my expectations, when I think I've been fairly clear that all I'm saying is that they didn't meet my expectations and I'm not sure how to approach them. No matter how explicitly I say, There's nothing wrong with this approach; I'm just not sure I like it, and I'm not sure why, you come back with comments criticizing me for not being sure I like something, which feels like a personal attack and does not help me to understand your point or articulate my own better.

I am getting kind of upset that you are turning the statement "The LoM vids I saw didn't hit my hot buttons" into "Stop boxing vids into a corner!"

Both modes of analysis may occur in both types of fandom, but they are not equally privileged or equally common there, based on my experience in lit and media fandoms.

We can have a discussion about what different kinds of fandoms do, and whether there is any difference in them besides the object of fannishness, but if so, I think we should separate it out from the discussion of vids in general or LoM vids in particular, because I am tired of getting jumped on for not liking a couple of vids and not having a perfectly articulate explanation of my complex reaction to complex works of art.

[identity profile] renenet.livejournal.com 2006-08-21 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, the thing I think I'm reacting to is the "fannishness" issue. It's the drift from "they don't meet my expectations," which is a personal statement, to questioning the fannishness of something, which goes way beyond individual response, that is tripping my trigger here. And that questioning the fannishness of vids that do certain things and not others seems to be operating throughout this entire discussion.

I think it's fine that you didn't like a couple of vids. If you had just said "I didn't like these couple of vids" and left it at that, then there would be no problem and no question of explanation. I never asked you to explain why you dind't like those vids. It's no skin of my nose or LoM's nose or the vidders' noses if you don't like those vids. But you opened the door to a whole host of larger matters in your self-questioning and I disagree with a lot of the assumptions that have been brought up or referenced by you or others about media fandom and vids and what they do.
ext_7843: (Default)

[identity profile] untrue-accounts.livejournal.com 2006-08-21 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, the thing I think I'm reacting to is the "fannishness" issue. It's the drift from "they don't meet my expectations," which is a personal statement, to questioning the fannishness of something, which goes way beyond individual response, that is tripping my trigger here. And that questioning the fannishness of vids that do certain things and not others seems to be operating throughout this entire discussion.

But the argument went in *the opposite direction*. I questioned the fannishness in the post, here's luck challenged me on that, I retracted my previous statement. Rivka questioned the retraction and/or the terms of the argument, and I mentioned some things I thought it might be relevant to explore.

[identity profile] renenet.livejournal.com 2006-08-22 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
When you and Rivka continue on with the whole "fannish"/"not fannish" thing and the emotional temperature stuff it seems to me it takes the argument right back to the statement you supposedly disavowed. Hence the phrase "operating throughout this entire discussion."

[identity profile] loligo.livejournal.com 2006-08-23 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, this debate seems mostly over, but since I was one of the people last year who imprecisely used the term "fannish" to describe the concept under discussion here, I figured I'd chuck in my two cents:

I'm relatively new to fan vids (four years, maybe?), but all the vids that I first encountered, that drew me into this area of fandom, were vids that overtly celebrated the vidder's emotional attachment to a particular character or relationship (or less frequently, the show/movie as a whole). And my impression from various History of Vidding discussions has been that vids like that, which whack you with an emotional 2X4, have been the meat and potatoes of vidding from the get-go.

I happen to respond well, and reliably, to vids like that. They're like a drug. I grabbed the word "fannish" to describe them not only because they're so prevalent in fandom, but because they offer easy, obvious access to the kind of passion that drives all fannish activity.

Vids that have other goals -- aesthetic play, interrogation of a genre, etc. -- are less reliable for me. When they work for me, they're brilliant, worlds better than an "OMG they are *so* doing it" vid (after all, I'm someone whose dominant mode of fannish participation is still the episode review). But when they don't work for me, they leave me cold -- I don't even get a cheap high. So the increase in number of vids like this that I saw at VVC last year was definitely a topic of interest to me. If I'd had a better word come to mind, I would have used it; I certainly didn't mean for people to take from it the implication that vids with goals other than sheer emotion aren't made by fans, or motivated by fannish enthusiasm.