thuviaptarth: little miss pretentious believes in a capella violence (little miss pretentious)
thuvia ptarth ([personal profile] thuviaptarth) wrote2008-09-19 07:30 am
Entry tags:

SPN 4x01

Huh. My vid-in-progress isn't jossed. It may even be kripked. That makes it feel strangely irrelevant in a way, but I will continue revising. I may not use any footage later than S3, though.

Also, my SPN crack theory vid would work even better. Not that I'm going to make it. I'm just saying.

It's not like I haven't written massively sketchy Sam/Ruby in which (a) Sam fucks Ruby partially in reaction to Dean's (upcoming) death, and (b) it's treated as rape of the possessed body, but if the show goes there, I need them to acknowledge it's rape, too. And somehow I don't have a lot of faith they will.

I'm also not 100% convinced the show is going Sam/Ruby and not "Ruby is living with Sam platonically and walking around in her underwear because they just killed a slimy demon and/or she likes to taunt Sam, who may or may not care," though I am terribly afraid the former XF writers on the show will convince them it's a good idea to play coy and ambiguous with the plotline.
ext_7850: by ev_vy (Default)

[identity profile] giandujakiss.livejournal.com 2008-09-19 11:36 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think that was Ruby then. I think Ruby possessed her later, and that we'll see revolving Rubys.
ext_7843: (Default)

[identity profile] untrue-accounts.livejournal.com 2008-09-19 11:37 am (UTC)(link)
That would also work okay with me, because this Ruby wasn't sarcastic or mean enough, and also Sam would not be a rapist. I am pro-not-rapist-Sam.
luminosity: (Default)

[personal profile] luminosity 2008-09-19 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Sam would not be a rapist, or he would not be a necrophiliac....
ext_7843: (Default)

[identity profile] untrue-accounts.livejournal.com 2008-09-19 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, necrophilia's grosser, but I'd argue that rape is morally worse. I mean, if the victim's dead, it's not like you can hurt them anymore ...